Good v. Sherman
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Colorado. Tried below before the Hon. L. Lindsay. The opinion and the second head-note disclose the material facts. R. L. & B. W. Breeding were the judgment creditors, and were co-defendants and appellants with the sheriff.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
The effects of the Buffalo Bayou, Brazos, and Colorado Bailroad Company, having been sold out on the first Tuesday in June, 1868, the directors, by operation of law (Article 4916, Paschal’s Digest), became the trustees of the sold-out company, and if there remained any property unsold, it passed into their hands for the benefit of creditors. But in their petition for injunction against the sheriff, James B. Good, and Breeding, they do not aver that there are any creditors other than B. W. Breeding, who, they admit, held a judgment for two thousand five hundred dollars, and the costs of his…
2Cited by4 opinions
- W. T. Carter & Bro. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio R. R. Co. v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- G. H. & San Antonio R. R. Co. v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- Houston & T. C. R. R. Co. v. ShirleyTexas Supreme Court · 1880