Legal Opinion

State v. Lamb

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 14, 1972No. 5642PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

The appellees were charged by information with the crime of first degree rape and upon trial were acquitted by a jury. The attorney general, at the request of the prosecuting attorney, brings this appeal pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-2720 (Repl. 1964) contending that the circuit court erred in refusing to give the state’s requested instruction on third degree rape. Section 41-3401 (Supp. 1969) defines third degree rape as being sexual intercourse with a female or carnally abusing a female who is less than 16 years old. It appears undisputed that the two victims were 14…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Pate v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Henson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Sutton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  5. Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. State v. ReedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API