State v. Lamb
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
The appellees were charged by information with the crime of first degree rape and upon trial were acquitted by a jury. The attorney general, at the request of the prosecuting attorney, brings this appeal pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-2720 (Repl. 1964) contending that the circuit court erred in refusing to give the state’s requested instruction on third degree rape. Section 41-3401 (Supp. 1969) defines third degree rape as being sexual intercourse with a female or carnally abusing a female who is less than 16 years old. It appears undisputed that the two victims were 14…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bradshaw v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Pate v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Henson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Sutton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- State v. ReedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973