Legal Opinion

A. E. Borden Co. v. Wurm

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 16, 1966PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARDEN, Justice.

On appeal from findings of a single Justice upon a complaint brought under the provisions of Chapter 107 § 4, XI R.S. 1954 (now 14 M.R.S.A. § 6051 subsection 11) to reach and apply to plaintiff’s claim certain assets allegedly the subject of fraudulent transfer.

The complaint raised other issues which, with the one currently before us, became the subject of ten days of hearings, reflected by four volumes of recorded testimony and some fifty documentary exhibits. The decisions of the single Justice on issues other than that upon which this appeal is based have become final.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chabot & Richard Co. v. ChabotSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
  2. Ayer v. Androscoggin & Kennebec Railway Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
  3. Estabrook v. Webber Motor Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  4. Ray v. LyfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  5. Perkins v. PerkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MannSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. Wildes v. Pens Unlimited Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. State v. AlleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  4. State v. HarrimanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  5. Laferriere v. ParadisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API