Legal Opinion

Claflin v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Writ of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Orrin N. Carter, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

Plaintiffs in error ask us to reverse a judgement entered by default, confirming a special assessment against their property for paving Harding avenue, in Chicago, because the court had no jurisdiction to enter the judgment. One reason alleged is, that the ordinance is void for a failure to specify the height of the curb, which is a part of the combined gutter and curb on each side of the roadway. The ordinance is not subject to the objection. It provides that the surface of the pavement at the center of the street shall conform exactly to the established grade of said Harding avenue and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northern Pacific Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Miller v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  3. City of Carlinville v. McClureIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. White v. City of AltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Chicago & Northern Pacific Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Excelsior Springs v. EttensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Craig v. People ex rel. GannawayIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. DearIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Sawyer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Rollo v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API