Legal Opinion

National Bank of Commerce Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Shull

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1976No. 40271PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

Appellants-defendants, Daniel L. Shull and Joan C. Shull, appeal from the overruling of their plea in abatement and the entry of a decree of foreclosure. We affirm.

On December 18, 1968, defendants Shull executed a note and mortgage to National Bank of Commerce Trust & Savings Association (NBC) on certain realty. The note provided for monthly payments of $263.57. On August 19, 1974, the Shulls borrowed $57,000 on an *591unsecured promissory note from NBC to purchase securities on margin from Dain, Kalman & Quail, Inc. Defendants refused to pay the $57,000 note, alleging violations of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kehr v. KehrNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Richardson v. OpeltNebraska Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Larsen v. First BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Farmers State Bank v. GermerNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Gnys v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. Pederson v. HowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Kash v. McDERMOTT & MILLER, PCNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API