Legal Opinion
State v. Bailey, C-060089 (4-27-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 27, 2007No. Nos. C-060089, C-060091PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION.
{¶ 1} In the case numbered B-0504953,1 defendant-appellant Cecil Bailey was indicted with another for aggravated robbery in violation of R.C. 2911.01(A)(1) and robbery in violation of R.C. 2911.02(A)(2). The aggravated-robbery count contained firearm specifications. While out on bond, Bailey was indicted in the case numbered B-05056752 for having a weapon while under a disability in violation of R.C. 2923.13(A)(2). The state specified that the disability derived from Bailey's aggravated-robbery indictment.
{¶ 2} The trial court consolidated Bailey's cases for a jury trial, and Bailey…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. FryeOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. Whitaker, 07ca3168 (8-11-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re WrightOhio Court of Appeals · 2007