Legal Opinion

Hoffman & Coppersmith v. Mechanics-American National Bank

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs instituted an attachment suit against defendants, in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, on June 3, 1919, on which date a garnishment was issued and served upon the Mechanics-American National Bank of St. Louis, a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the United States. The garnishment was ancillary to the attachment suit. Interrogatories were filed by plaintiffs, to which garnishee answered that it neither owed the defendants, Feuer Spiegel, anything, nor had in its possession any of their property, and asked for an allowance for attorney's fees and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vickers v. Machinery Warehouse & Sales Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Marx v. HartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Daly v. Butchers' & Drovers' BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  4. Atwood v. HaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Miller v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Graff v. Continental Auto Insurance UnderwritersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Wolfley v. WootenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Foristel v. Security National Bank, Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  4. Barnes v. HiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API