Legal Opinion

Foley v. Foley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1916No. Appeal, No. 6PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 6, March T., 1916, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Oct. T., 1913, No. 12, on bill in equity in case pf Bertha Foley v. B. E. Foley. Bill in equity for an injunction to restrain the sale of real estate, and to compel the defendant to contribute to the support of the complainant, his wife, and her children. Motion to stay execution. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was refusal to stay execution.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The decree in this case was entered September 23, 1914. Under it the appellant was bound to pay to the appellee $1,000.00 .within ten days and $250.00 in three months from that date. It was a part of the decree that the appellant’s real estate be released from all claim for support and maintenance by the appellee and her three daughters and that on the payment of the sum decreed to be paid the appellant’s land should' be clear from all claim for dower or any other rights now or hereafter allowed by law to a married woman who survives her husband. And the appellee was…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mallinger v. MallingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Mallinger v. MallingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Mallinger v. MallingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API