Legal Opinion

People v. Arrington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant claims that he was denied a fair trial under indictment No. 1046/85 by the prosecutor’s cross-examination and summation. We first note that since the defendant failed to object to the majority of the prosecutor’s comments he has failed to preserve those issues for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, we find no error in the prosecutor’s statements. Contrary to the defendant’s claims, the prosecutor did not elicit inadmissible hearsay testimony when cross-examining him. The prosecutor was merely attempting to complete a narrative of the criminal incident for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. People v. QuesadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. NickelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. People v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. People v. CaicedoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. VelsorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API