Legal Opinion
Mendell v. Greenberg
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 16, 1989No. 81 Civ. 3483 (JES)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge:
In this action, plaintiff Ira L. Mendell alleges that a proxy statement issued with respect to a merger between Loehmann’s, Inc. (“Loehmann’s”) and a company organized and controlled by AEA Investors Inc. (“AEA”) was false and misleading due to the misstatement or omission of material facts in violation of section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78n(a), and Rule 14a-9, 17 C.F.R. § 240.14a-9. Defendants move for summary judgment and sanctions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11, and plaintiff moves to conditionally strike defendants’…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Rodman v. Grant FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Stephen Berg v. First American Bankshares, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Valente v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- Lewis v. Oppenheimer & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mendell v. GreenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Mendell v. GreenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991