Legal Opinion

Contreras v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 8, 1992No. 10-91-032-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CUMMINGS, Justice.

Alfredo Gomez Contreras was found guilty of aggravated sexual assault, and the jury assessed punishment at ninety-nine years in prison. He appeals the judgment in two points of error. We will affirm the judgment.

In point one, Contreras alleges that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict at the guilt-innocent phase of the trial. He contends that there was insuffi*326cient evidence to prove that the victim was not his spouse at the time of the offense.

In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we must determine whether, “after viewing the evidence in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Washington v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1992
  5. Wendt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API