Legal Opinion

Stockton Building & Loan Ass'n v. Chalmers

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1884No. 8,875PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of El Dorado, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.

—This is an action to foreclose a mortgage executed by one Robert Chalmers in his lifetime. His executor and executrix and a junior mortgagee were made defendants. Joseph and Martin Alhoff are inter venors, and the court having rendered judgment against them, and directed a sale of the mortgaged premises, they have appealed. The intervention is based upon the following facts: —

In 1855 one M. Alhoff went into the occupation of a small tract of unsurveyed government land, and thence resided thereon with his family until his death. He extended Iris possessions so as to embrace some twenty-two or…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seibel v. BathWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Nidever v. AyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Chalmers v. ChalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API