Legal Opinion

Samuels v. California Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1960No. Appeal, 114PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

The only question here is whether the appellant should be allowed interest prior to a verdict in his favor on a claim against a fire insurance company brought under a contract of insurance.

The plaintiffs insured their premises with Caledonian Insurance Company whose liability under the policy was taken over by the defendant company. On January 16, 1952, the insured premises were damaged by fire. The plaintiffs gave notice of the loss to A. M. Eckert, agent for the defendant, who acknowledged the notice under date of January 17, 1952. Formal proof of loss was filed March…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. West Republic Mining Co. v. Jones & LaughlinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  2. Palmgreen v. Palmer's Garage, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Western & A. Pipe Lines v. Home Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1891
  4. Peyton v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. J. Purdy Cope Hotels Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Benefit Trust Life Insurance Company v. Union National Bank Of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Berkeley Inn, Inc. v. Centennial InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Arcuri v. WeissSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Fratto v. Northern Insurance Company of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Lillian Atlin v. Security-Connecticut Life Insurance Co. v. National Paragon Corporation v. Nilta Enterprises, Inc. Appeal of Lillian AtlinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API