Legal Opinion

United States v. Jiménez-Benceví

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided March 21, 2013No. Criminal No. 12-221(JAF)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOSÉ ANTONIO FUSTÉ, District Judge.

We must decide whether Xavier Jiménez-Benceví, a defendant facing capital charges, qualifies as mentally retarded1 *362and, therefore, may not be sentenced to death. See Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002) (holding that the execution of mentally retarded persons constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment). After having considered the testimony and evidence presented, we conclude that Jiménez-Benceví is not mentally retarded and is therefore eligible to be tried as a capital…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Hooks v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. Percy Levar Walton v. Gene M. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  4. Thomas v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Bruce v. Weekly World News, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API