Marx v. Rice
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The defendants, Alexander S. Rice, individually and in his representative capacity on behalf of the estates of Bernard Strauss and Florence R. Strauss, and others moved for summary judgment in their favor on the counterclaim filed by the defendants-counterclaimants, Robert Herzog et al. With the exception of the question of perpetuities, the counterclaim sets up the same allegations and seeks the same relief as did the complaint filed by the plaintiffs. The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bartlett v. SearsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Warren's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Fiduciary Trust Co. v. MishouMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- McGill v. Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
- Minot v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cleveland Trust Co. v. McQuadeOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
- National State Bank of Newark v. MorrisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- The Trenton Banking Co. v. HawleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Wright v. RenehanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950