Testa v. Strickland
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
“ ‘The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the Family Court, and that court’s determination regarding the credibility of witnesses is entitled to great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed if supported by the record’ ” (Matter of Salazar v Melendez, 97 AD3d 754, 755 [2012], quoting Matter of Richardson v Richardson, 80 AD3d 32, 43-44 [2010]). At a fact-finding hearing pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner has the burden of establishing the allegations contained in the petition by a “fair preponderance of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Cavanaugh v. MaddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- McLoughlin v. McLoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Hasbrouck v. HasbrouckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Wendy Q. v. Jason Q.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cassie v. CassieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Bah v. BahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Miloslau v. MiloslauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Streat v. StreatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Musheyev v. MusheyevAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.