Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of LaRose

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 22, 1999No. 91,075, 91,391Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ADAMS, Judge:

¶ 1 Terry LaRose (Guardian) and his surety, Lawyers Surety Corporation (Surety), appeal the trial court's order surcharging Guardian and granting judgment to each of 'the appellees after concluding Guardian failed to properly account for funds he received for the appellees and which he contends were used for the appellees' benefit and support. 1 The trial court made a specific finding that Surety had participated in the proceedings and was bound by the judgments granted against Guardian. The trial court also ordered Guardian to pay attorney fees and costs to the appellees,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williamson v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Kirkpatrick v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Wabaunsee v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Barker v. BledsoeDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Pettit v. American National Bank of AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API