Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Falls

Roanoke County Circuit Court

Decided December 3, 1999No. Case No. CL98000525-00PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Jonathan M. Apgar

The Court has reviewed the memoranda of counsel and is now ready to rule.

Facts

The facts are accurately stated in Plaintiffs Memorandum in Support of her Motion to Exclude, with the addition that the proposed defense expert witnesses, Dr. Gustafson and Dr. Hormel, never actually saw the Plaintiff in a doctor/patient relationship and reviewed only information that had been given to them by counsel as a result of the discovery process.

Question

May the Defendants use individuals associated with Plaintiffs health care provider as expert witnesses against the Plaintiff?

Discu…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stigliano v. Connaught Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Eva P. De Foe v. Benjamin Duhl, Isidore Suchman, Paul Gaier, and Sol BergerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  3. Maxey v. HubbleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  4. Stevens v. BarnhartCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. O'Dell v. Cedar Lakes, L.P.Fairfax County Circuit Court · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goodloe v. SharpeVirginia Circuit Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API