Legal Opinion

McBride v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1962No. 76PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

McBride was indicted for burglary and petty larceny. At the first trial, where the jury failed to reach a verdict, the state’s principal witness was McBride’s stepson, Robert Lee Carr. This witness was not present at the second trial, and over Me- Bride’s objection the court allowed the jury to hear Carr’s former testimony which had been electronically recordedi The jury found McBride guilty of both offenses, and he has appealed. The main question here is whether it was reversible error to permit use of the witness’s former testimony.

When the matter came up before the trial…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. On Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Commonwealth v. GalloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. State Ex Rel. Gladden v. LonerganOregon Supreme Court · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Gafford v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. DeSacia v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Kugzruk v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Otis Elevator Company v. McLaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1965

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API