Legal Opinion

In re Woods

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1994No. 07S00-8908-DI-654PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

The Respondent, David T. Woods, has been charged by the Disciplinary Commission of this Court with failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client, such conduct being in violation of Rule 1.3 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law and D.R. 6-101(A)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility for Attorneys at Law. Pursuant to Indiana Rule of Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 11(d), the parties have tendered for this Court's approval a Statement of Cireumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline. This Court…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of WoodsIndiana Supreme Court · 1987

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of WoodsIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API