Legal Opinion

In Re Kossow

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1978No. 11954, 12076, 12077 and 12960PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

These consolidated appeals present one question: when the Corporation Counsel elects not to proceed with the judicial stage of an involuntary civil commitment proceeding, may the court permit the private petitioner, through his or her counsel, to press the case for commitment? Appellants argue that private petitioners lack legal capacity to pursue the case beyond their presentation to the Commission on Mental Health — that the decision to seek someone’s involuntary confinement to a hospital, upon recommendation of the Commission, is exclusively within the discretion of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Criminal Investigation No. 1-162Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Matter of NelsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. United States v. EllerbeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. In re M.M.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Pacini v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API