Legal Opinion

Nonn v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided March 9, 2000No. 13-97-658-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Justice DORSEY.

A jury convicted appellant Jaime Charles Nonn of capital murder. Because the State did not seek the death penalty the trial court assessed punishment at life in prison. By seven issues appellant complains that the trial court erred in admitting photographs in evidence, erred in admitting his written statement and his two video-recorded statements in evidence, failed to provide him a transcript of his pre-trial hearing, failed to instruct the jury on a lesser-included offense, and he complains of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

Carl Ginder and his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nonn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  3. Nonn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Nonn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  5. Nonn, Jaime CharlesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API