Legal Opinion

State v. Meek

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1978No. 76-1374PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.

The single issue to be determined in this appeal is whether the use of the unloaded gun in the robbery supports appellee’s conviction for aggravated robbery.,R. C. 2911.01 delineates the elements of aggravated robbery as follows:

“(A),No person, in attempting or committing a theft offense as defined in section 2913.01 of the Revised Code, or in fleeing immediately after such attempt or offense, shall do either of the following:
“(1) Have a deadly weapon or dangerous ordnance :as defined in section 2923.11 of the Revised Code on or about his person or under his control:
“(2) Inflict, or attempt…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loy Lavator Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. State v. LeviSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  3. State v. KowertzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. State v. MontanoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. VondenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re GoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. TateOhio Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API