United States v. Francisco Alvarez-Pineda
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
When sentencing Defendant Appellee Francisco Alvarez-Pineda (“Alvarez”) for various drug charges related to his being a “backpacker,” 1 the district court departed downward under United States Sentencing Guideline § 5K2.0 on the ground that Alvarez’s conduct was “aberrant behavior.” 2 The Government appeals the departure, arguing that the district court abused its discretion by departing without a sufficient basis in law or fact. We agree with the Government, and thus we REVERSE and REMAND for re-sentencing consistent with this opinion at such time as Alvarez’s presence is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. LangCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. McClatcheyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Robert SpinelloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Stephen J. Sabbeth, Carole Sabbeth, Also Known as Carole FioreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. GrovesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.