Legal Opinion

United States v. Francisco Alvarez-Pineda

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 3, 2001No. 99-2313PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

When sentencing Defendant Appellee Francisco Alvarez-Pineda (“Alvarez”) for various drug charges related to his being a “backpacker,” 1 the district court departed downward under United States Sentencing Guideline § 5K2.0 on the ground that Alvarez’s conduct was “aberrant behavior.” 2 The Government appeals the departure, arguing that the district court abused its discretion by departing without a sufficient basis in law or fact. We agree with the Government, and thus we REVERSE and REMAND for re-sentencing consistent with this opinion at such time as Alvarez’s presence is…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. LangCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. McClatcheyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Robert SpinelloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Stephen J. Sabbeth, Carole Sabbeth, Also Known as Carole FioreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. GrovesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API