People v. Vasquez
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
It was error to deny defendant’s timely request for a missing witness charge. On this appeal, the People do not dispute that defendant met her initial burden of establishing prima facie that the police informant Ephraim Pena was knowledgeable about a pending material issue in the case — albeit an issue that was raised by the defendant. Moreover, it cannot be doubted that there was a sufficient showing that Pena was in the "control” of the People and could be expected to testify…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. SavinonNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Davis v. MantelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- People v. KassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.