Legal Opinion
Davidson v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 15, 2006No. AC 27001PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*147 Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, Roy P. Davidson, appeals from the decision of the trial court granting the motion to dismiss filed by the defendants, the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (authority) and the Mohegan Sun Casino (casino). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the defendants are cloaked with sovereign immunity.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff was employed as an entertainment technician at the casino. In July, 2003, the plaintiff requested leave to have dental surgery performed. His…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kizis v. Morse Diesel International, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Chayoon v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Wendt v. Rainey, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Davidson v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006