Blake v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The offense is murder; punishment fixed at 'death.
The circumstantial evidence and the direct evidence, consisting of the admission and confession of the appellant, are quite sufficient to support the jury’s finding that the appellant shot and killed the deceased and robbed- him. His principal defense was insanity due to the excessive use of narcotics.
Bill of Exceptions No. 1 relates to the action of the court in declining to continue the preliminary hearing upon the issue of present insanity. Upon that hearing, which took place on the 25th of May, the jury found…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Campbell v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Ex Parte MillikinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Tuley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Hanson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.