Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schanerman v. Everett & Carbin, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 5, 1952Published

1Dissent

Jayne, J. A. D.

(dissenting). My conception of the characteristics of this ease constrains me to dissent from the conclusion expressed in the majority opinion. In obedience to Rule 4:4-6 I shall tersely state the basic reasons for my disagreement.

I assent to the following postulate put forward by the majority:

“Of course, plaintiff earned liis commission if he performed his engagement, whether or not G. M. E. and 0. Corpora lion accepted Driver’s offer: the contract, as testified to by plaintiff, did not condition the payment of the commission upon the owner’s acceptance of any offer produced,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stanton v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Stokes v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  3. Jacobs v. RothschildSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Rifkind v. TurnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API