Solarcity Corp. v. Ariz. Dep't of Revenue
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE TIMMER, opinion of the Court:
¶ 1 With exceptions, all property in Arizona is "subject to taxation to be ascertained as provided by law." Ariz. Const. art. 9, § 2 (13); A.R.S. § 42-11002. 1 Property is valued for tax purposes either "centrally" by the Arizona Department of Revenue ("ADOR") or "locally" by county assessors. See A.R.S. §§ 42-13002 to -13501; 42-14001 to -14503. Valuation is based on the "full cash value" of the property as directed by statute. Id . § 42- 11001(6). Unless a statute prescribes otherwise, full cash value corresponds to market value, determined by applying…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bennett v. BrownlowArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Delgado v. Manor Care of Tucson AZ, LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Southwest Airlines Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- SolarCity Corp. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
3Cited by5 opinions
- Teufel v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Diana Glazer v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Leach v. reagan/clean Energy for a Healthy ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Pinal Cnty. v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Carbajal v. Home Depot IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024