Legal Opinion

Timbrook v. Metzeler Automotive Profile Systems Iowa, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided July 25, 2002No. 3:01-CV-10122PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO JOIN A NECESSARY PARTY UNDER RULE 19(a)

WALTERS, Chief United States Magistrate Judge.

The above resisted motion is before the Court (# 18). The Court has carefully considered the motion papers and now rules as follows.

Plaintiffs decedent, Kenneth C. Timbrook, a railroad switchman employed by Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (the railroad), was killed in the course of his duties while working on defendant Met-zeler’s property in Keokuk, Iowa. The incident resulted from what plaintiff claims to have been the railroad’s “principal negligence”.

On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Temple v. Synthes Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Dou Yee Enterprises (S) PTE, Ltd. v. Advantek, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  4. Estrella v. V & G Management Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
  5. Leick v. Schnellpressenfabrik Ag HeidelbergDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clay v. AIG Aerospace Insurance Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2014
  2. Barrett v. Prison Health Services, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2009
  3. Manufacturers Bank & Trust Company v. Lanesboro Sales Commission, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API