Timbrook v. Metzeler Automotive Profile Systems Iowa, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO JOIN A NECESSARY PARTY UNDER RULE 19(a)
WALTERS, Chief United States Magistrate Judge.
The above resisted motion is before the Court (# 18). The Court has carefully considered the motion papers and now rules as follows.
Plaintiffs decedent, Kenneth C. Timbrook, a railroad switchman employed by Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (the railroad), was killed in the course of his duties while working on defendant Met-zeler’s property in Keokuk, Iowa. The incident resulted from what plaintiff claims to have been the railroad’s “principal negligence”.
On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Temple v. Synthes Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dou Yee Enterprises (S) PTE, Ltd. v. Advantek, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Estrella v. V & G Management Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Leick v. Schnellpressenfabrik Ag HeidelbergDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clay v. AIG Aerospace Insurance Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2014
- Barrett v. Prison Health Services, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2009
- Manufacturers Bank & Trust Company v. Lanesboro Sales Commission, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2020