Legal Opinion

Allen Ex Rel. Harlow v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 26, 1926PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was commenced in the Circuit Court of Caldwell County, Missouri, by George Harlow, who was duly appointed and qualified as the next friend of the minors hereafter mentioned, whose names and ages are as follows: Vivian Allen of the age of twelve years, Ruth Allen of the age of ten years, Helen Allen of the age of nine years, Velma F. Allen of the age of five years, and Elizabeth Allen, less than one year of age, for the purpose of prosecuting this action for a penalty of $10,000 under the provisions of Section 4217, Revised Statutes 1919, by reason of defendants' alleged wrongful…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Becke v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Simpson v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  3. Hinzeman v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chawkley v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. Pentecost v. St. Louis Merchants Bridge Terminal RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Anderson v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  4. Herrell v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  5. Cheatham v. ChartrauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API