Legal Opinion

MATTER OF DIAZ CHEM. CORP. v. New York State Div. of Human Rights

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1998PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Appellant argues that the gender discrimination complaint against it under Executive Law § 296 should be dismissed because the State Division of Human Rights (SDHR) delayed 11 years before holding a hearing on the complaint, and then delayed its order for another three years. Ultimately, SDHR awarded complainant two years of back pay, and it also awarded damages for mental anguish that were subsequently reduced by the Appellate Division.

This Court has previously rejected the argument that a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works v. OvsanikNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Louis Harris & Associates, Inc. v. deLeonNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Aurecchione v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Burton v. MattelianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Board of Education of New Paltz Central School District v. DonaldsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center v. Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Kondracke v. BlueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API