Dorador v. State

The appellant was tried and convicted in district court on two indictments: (1) possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance (marihuana); and (2) delivery of a controlled substance (marihuana). On appeal defendant first asserts he was denied a fair trial because he was tried on two separate indictments arising out of the same circumstance; and a conviction and sentencing on both indictments constituted double jeopardy.

Dorador was charged under § 35-347.-31(a), W.S.1957, 1973 Cum.Supp. Insofar as pertinent, the section provides:

“ * * * it is unlawful for any person to * * *…