Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Hoge-Warren-Zimmerman Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 24, 1989No. 88-0157PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE EGAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case involves one of the slowly dwindling but still lingering causes of action which arose before the passage of the Contribution Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 70, par. 301 et seq.) and Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package Machinery Co. (1977), 70 Ill. 2d 1, 374 N.E.2d 437.

The plaintiff, Commonwealth Edison Co. (Edison), appeals from an order granting the motion of the defendant, Hoge-Warren-Zimmerman Co. (HWZ), to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint for implied indemnity. HWZ cross-appeals from the trial court’s rejection of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package MacHinery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bell v. Louisville & NashVille RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Gertz v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Muhlbauer v. KruzelIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Frazer v. A. F. Munsterman, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kemner v. Norfolk & Western Railway Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. Cretex Companies, Inc. v. Precast Engineering Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API