Commonwealth v. Campbell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
The sole issue presented by this direct appeal from a judgment of sentence following a jury verdict of first degree murder is whether the admission of defendant’s confession into evidence was error and violated the principles of Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S. Ct. 1758 (1964). We hold that defendant must be granted a new trial, for he was never warned of his absolute light to remain silent. The facts as found by the suppression hearing court are as follows:
On the afternoon of November 29, 1963, one Gust Georges was murdered in his home in Allegheny…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Commonwealth v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Com. v. Myers, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.