Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Root

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 12, 1917No. 7602PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Harper County ; W. C. Crow, Judge. Action of forcible entry and detainer by H. A. Root against L. C. McCullough. Judgment for plaintiff in justice court, and defendant appeals, and from the granting of plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrett, J.

This cause was commenced in a justice court by H. A. Root, defendant in error, against L. C. McCullough, plaintiff in error, for the possession of certain real estate.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the justice court. Root, the plaintiff in the justice court, sued for the possession of certain real estate under the forcible entry and detainer act, making the usual allegations as to his right to immediate possession and the unlawful detention of said real estate by, the defendant, also alleging that notice to vacate had been duly served. Trial was had which resulted in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Faust v. FentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Cochran Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. LockeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Bardwell v. Riverside Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. WattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Offutt v. Fizz-O Water Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API