Legal Opinion

State v. Parker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1992No. 9120SC380Published

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Though at trial defendant objected to the reading of a part of the transcript, defendant now argues that the trial court erred by initially refusing to read the transcript of the victim’s testimony to the jury after the jury began its deliberations. Specifically, the defendant now contends that the jury’s verdict was not rendered by each of its twelve members. We disagree.

*488This case is controlled by State v. Jacobs, 25 N.C. App. 500, 214 S.E.2d 254, cert. denied, 287 N.C. 666, 216 S.E.2d 909 (1975). In Jacobs, the jury returned from the jury room and the foreman asked the judge…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API