Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Williams v. District Grand Lodge No. 21, Etc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1939No. 17244Published

1ConcurrenceJanvier, Judge

I thoroughly agree that it would produce a great hardship to deprive the beneficiary of James Williams of the death benefit for which he, during the twenty-five years of his life, had made regular payments, and, since my associates, among the reasons given for the result reached, have found one to which I can subscribe, I have concurred in the decree rendered. But I cannot refrain from protesting against certain other statements made in the majority opinion since' I feel that they do violence to well-established legal principles and since I sense.the danger that, in the future, those…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knights of Pythias v. WithersSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Centanni v. Southern Life & Health Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Rucker v. Most Worshipful St. John's Grand LodgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API