Legal Opinion
United States v. Racich
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 25, 1999No. CIV. 97-0768-R; CRIM. 92-1485-RPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE
RHOADES, Senior District Judge.
I. Overview
Petitioner John M. Racich has filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the reasons stated below, the Court denied the motion in an order dated August 26, 1998. The Court now amends the original order, nunc pro tune, in order to correct several citation errors. 1
II. Background
A. Factual Background
The facts of this case began in Mexico. On the night of November 3, 1992, a Mexican police officer named Javier Ojeda stopped…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Angela RuizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. LeonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Angela RuizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001