Emery v. Gilkeson
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County
1Opinion of the Court
Harvey, J.,
Defendant, contending that the return shows no legal service, has moved to set aside the service of the writ of summons in assumpsit.
*358The return reads as follows: “Served the within summons in assumpsit July 7, 1941, upon the within named defendant Paul Gilkeson by handing a true and attested copy of the within writ, together with a copy of plaintiff’s statement of claim to Ralph Hamman, agent of the within named defendant, Paul Gilkeson, at his place of business, Corner Stores, Schuylkill Twp., Chester County, Penna., at 11:30 a.m. and made known the contents thereof, said deft.,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lehigh Valley Insurance v. FullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
- Winrow v. RaymondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
- Rogers v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930