Legal Opinion

LaSalle v. Wing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination sanctioning petitioner for failure to attend a work experience program interview without good cause is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Bishop v New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 246 AD2d 391, lv denied 91 NY2d 813; see also, Matter of Kelly v Wing, 237 AD2d 976). The medical reports received at the fair hearing establish that petitioner is able to participate in the work experience program with stated limitations (see, Social Services Law § 332-b [4] [e] [ii]). We…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bishop v. New York State Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Kelly v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gokey v. BerlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. McIntosh v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. SCOTT, TRACY E. v. BERLIN, BETHAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Scott v. BerlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API