Legal Opinion

Jones v. Southern Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1929No. 39764PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

Ross V. Hawk had an undivided one-fourth interest in an estate. In the estate was a tract of 280 acres, apparently unincumbered, and 40 acres incumbered with a life estate to Della Hawk. The land is in Dallas County. Hawk wanted Jones to buy his interest. Hawk had been under apparent guardianship, as a spendthrift. Jones told Hawk that he, Hawk, could not convey any title. Hawk said he was going to be released from the guardianship. Jones and Hawk, on September 21, 1926, signed a paper by which Hawk agreed to sell his interest in the land for $2,000, and by which Jones accepted the offer,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Butler Bros. v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Interstate Casualty Co. v. Wallins Creek Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Fullerton v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. Southern Railway News Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Red Giant Oil Co. v. LawlorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  2. Metcalf v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. American Family Mutual Insurance v. KivelaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Hawkeye Casualty Co. v. StokerNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Boggs v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API