Legal Opinion

Halloran's National Detective Agency v. Weiden

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1927No. Docket No. 47PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff, a detective agency, was employed by defendant. A statement of account of the items of charges for services rendered was given to defendant, together with long and detailed reports of the services for which the charges were made. He did not pay. This suit followed. Plaintiff had verdict and judgment. Defendant brings error.

Plaintiff’s first witness was its bookkeeper, called to prove the book account. She testified of having made the entries in the ledger account; that the same were correct; that the account was kept in the ordinary and usual way, posted daily as near as maybe; that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kuennan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Siewek v. F. Joseph Lamb Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Poleski v. Polish American Publishing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Funk v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Funk v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API