First National Bank v. Adams

Ethridge, J.,

delivered' the opinion of the court.

The suggestion of error asserts that the two former opinions in this case are inconsistent and that they are only alike in one respect, in that they were reversals of the court below. The two former opinions are reported in 108 Miss. 346, 67 So. 407, and 116 Miss. 450, 77 So. 195; and a careful examination will show that they deal with separate propositions and are not in conflict one with the other.

*280. It is insisted also in the suggestion of error that the appellant was entitled to a reversal on the pleadings; that the plea of the plaintiff was…