Legal Opinion
Konecky v. Horowitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 25, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action based on a series of promissory notes, the defendants Harvey Horowitz, Shirley Horowitz, Dennis Waschitz, Roni Waschitz, Frank Catapano, and Sarah Catapano appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Goldstein, J.), dated April 12, 1990, which denied their motion (1) which was denominated as for renewal, but which was, in effect, for reargument of a prior motion by the plaintiff for summary judgment against them, which had been granted in an order of the same court dated June 6, 1989, and (2) for leave to serve an amended answer.
Ordered that the appeal from so much…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mgrditchian v. DonatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- DeFreitas v. Board of Education of City of Mount Vernon District No. 416Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Patterson v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Mader v. MaderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Martin Mechanical Corp. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Yarde v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Desola v. Mads, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Wavecrest Apartments Corp. v. JarmainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Tobjy v. TobjyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992