Legal Opinion

United States v. Hofbrauhaus of Hartford, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 28, 1970No. Crim. No. 12654PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS

BLUMENFELD, District Judge.

Defendants, Hofbrauhaus of Hartford, Inc. (hereinafter Hofbrauhaus), Violet Chapman, and Anthony Romano, move under Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) to suppress for use as evidence 15 bottles of alcoholic beverage removed from the premises of Hofbrauhaus on March 21, 1969, and further to suppress all analyses and reports of chemical tests performed upon said bottles and their contents.

The facts in this case have been stipulated. Each of the defendants is charged with four counts of violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5301(c), which makes it a criminal of*546fense…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Wedgewood, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  2. People v. CioffiNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cellermaster Wines, Inc. v. ChastainDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API