Haser Ex Rel. Haser v. Pape
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Christianson,' J.
(concurring). I concur in the conclusions reached in the opinion prepared by' Judge Gronna: — that the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant Yellow Cab Company and that the judgment appealed from must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.
The defendant, Yellow Cab Company, was licensed to operate as a carrier of persons in the City of Jamestown and was authorized pursuant to certificate issued by the Public Service Commission of North Dakota (NDRC 1943, Sec 49-1801), to operate as a common carrier of persons in certain territory including the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. SchuylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Carroll v. . Staten Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Opsahl v. JuddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Anderson v. Yellow Cab Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- McNeill v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.