Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Haser Ex Rel. Haser v. Pape

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1949No. File 7155Published

1Concurrence

Christianson,' J.

(concurring). I concur in the conclusions reached in the opinion prepared by' Judge Gronna: — that the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant Yellow Cab Company and that the judgment appealed from must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.

The defendant, Yellow Cab Company, was licensed to operate as a carrier of persons in the City of Jamestown and was authorized pursuant to certificate issued by the Public Service Commission of North Dakota (NDRC 1943, Sec 49-1801), to operate as a common carrier of persons in certain territory including the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. SchuylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Carroll v. . Staten Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Opsahl v. JuddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. Anderson v. Yellow Cab Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. McNeill v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API