Legal Opinion

Depp v. Holland

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1994PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

Carol A. Holland (Mother) appeals from the order of the trial court denying her exceptions to the hearing officer’s recommendation that no support award be entered and that she pay $50 per month toward arrears to David Depp (Father). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The facts and procedural history may be summarized as follows: While the parties have never been married to each other, they are the parents of Kyle Holland Depp (Kyle), who was born on September 25,1988. From his birth until November 17, 1989, Mother had primary physical custody of Kyle and Father was paying…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Melzer v. WitsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Women's Homoeopathic Hospital of Philadelphia CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. DeWalt v. DeWaltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McClain v. McClainSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Reinert v. ReinertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Kelley v. KelleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Belcher v. BelcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. R.C. v. J.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API