Legal Opinion

The Boveric

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1909No. 1,637PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The question here is whether the appellee was the fellow servant of the winchman through whose negligence the injury occurred. The rule is well settled, as stated by Cockburn, C. J., in Rourke v. White Moss Collier Co., 2 C.P.D. 209, that: “When' one person lends his servant to another for a particular employment, the servant, for anything done in that particular employment, must be dealt with as the servant of the man to whom he is lent, *276although he remains the general servant of the person who lent him.”

But whether the servant of one master, when…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. SHERLOCK v. Alling, AdmInistratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. United States v. SheaSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Coughlan v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  5. The SlingsbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API