Legal Opinion

Lytle's Exec'r v. Pope's Adm'r

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 13, 1850PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the Louisville Chancery Court. Chancery.. ¡Case ,59.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Maeshall

These three writs of error are prosecuted"for the reversal of a decree -rendered in the two consolidated cases of Pope’s adm”r. vs Rowan’s exec’rs., and Lytle’s ■exec’r.; and heirs, &c., and of Hatch against the same. The bill of Pope afterwards revived by his Executors was filed on the 29th-of October 1830, that of Hatch on the 15th of March 1839. Each complainant ’sets up distinct claims against William Lytle, and each seeks to subject to the satisfaction of his claim certain lots and lands in Louisville and Portland, formerly the property of Lytle, and alleged to have been purchased by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wenzell v. Breckinridge's Ex'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pegram v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Magruder v. AdmireMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API